Reading Kuhn is important for understanding the rest of the sociology of science that follows, so it's something one must read if that's what they're studying. I found this text to be rather dry and tedious to read, so it is, perhaps, not the best book for someone looking to being to explore the field to read, but at the same time, maybe it is.
I think the major problem is, after 50 years the ideas of paradigm shifts and revolutions are so ingrained in the way that we study the history, philosophy, and sociology of science that it just doesn't seem that revolutionary anymore, and after becoming well versed in the history of since in the 18th, 19th, and 20th century the book just seems like a long series of name drops to support one position.
I will never cease to be amazed that Kuhn considers this 172 page book to be a mere essay.
It had no application to my thesis, but necessary to my thesis which is frustrating.I give it an 8 out of 10.
I think the major problem is, after 50 years the ideas of paradigm shifts and revolutions are so ingrained in the way that we study the history, philosophy, and sociology of science that it just doesn't seem that revolutionary anymore, and after becoming well versed in the history of since in the 18th, 19th, and 20th century the book just seems like a long series of name drops to support one position.
I will never cease to be amazed that Kuhn considers this 172 page book to be a mere essay.
It had no application to my thesis, but necessary to my thesis which is frustrating.I give it an 8 out of 10.









