I read this book for the first time when I was in grade 8 and I thought it was fantastic. I wasn't completely wrong, but The Archer's Tale didn't live up to my memory. That being said, it was still a good book.
I read several reviews for it on Goodreads, and one, in particular, caught my attention. It was fairly negative, which is why it caught my attention. It wasn't complaining about the things I would expect from historical fiction, historical inaccuracy, which doesn't really exist in this novel due to the impeccable research done by Mr. Cornwell, or lack of a plot line, which also doesn't apply to this book; but only that they failed to read the back of the book and hated the subject matter of the book. I, on the other hand, happen to love the hundred years war and have done quite a bit of research on English archers and foot soldiers and their weaponry and war arms from this period when I was younger.
Although I did not enjoy as much as the first time, it was still a good story. I give this book 8 urine samples out of 10.
I read several reviews for it on Goodreads, and one, in particular, caught my attention. It was fairly negative, which is why it caught my attention. It wasn't complaining about the things I would expect from historical fiction, historical inaccuracy, which doesn't really exist in this novel due to the impeccable research done by Mr. Cornwell, or lack of a plot line, which also doesn't apply to this book; but only that they failed to read the back of the book and hated the subject matter of the book. I, on the other hand, happen to love the hundred years war and have done quite a bit of research on English archers and foot soldiers and their weaponry and war arms from this period when I was younger.
Although I did not enjoy as much as the first time, it was still a good story. I give this book 8 urine samples out of 10.
No comments:
Post a Comment